Declaration Of Independence
The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written
document
of Western civilization. This essay seeks to illuminate that
artistry by probing
the discourse microscopically at the level of the
sentence, phrase, word, and
syllable. By approaching the Declaration in this
way, we can shed light both on
its literary qualities and on its rhetorical
power as a work designed to
convince the American colonies they were
justified in seeking to establish them
as an independent nation. The
introduction consists of the first paragraph a
single, lengthy, periodic
sentence: When in the Course of human events, it
becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have
connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God
entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare
the causes which impel them to the separation. Taken out of
context, this
sentence is general it could be used as the introduction to a
declaration by
anyone. Seen within its original context, however, it is a model
of
refinement, and suggestion that worked on several levels of meaning
and
allusion. This orients readers toward a favorable view of America and
prepares
them for the rest of the Declaration. It dignifies the Revolution as
a challenge
of principle. The introduction identifies the purpose of the
Declaration as
simply to "declare" to announce publicly in explicit terms the
"causes"
impelling America to leave the British Empire. Rather than
presenting one side
in a public controversy on which good and decent people
could differ, the
Declaration claims to do no more than a natural
philosopher would do in
reporting the causes of any physical event. The
issue, it implies, is not one of
interpretation, but one of observation. The
most important word in the
introduction is "necessary." To say an act was
necessary implied that it was
impelled by fate or determined by the operation
of foolproof natural laws. The
Revolution was not merely preferable,
defensible, or justifiable. It was as
inescapable, as inevitable, and as
unavoidable within the course of human events
as the motions of the tides or
the changing of the seasons within the course of
natural events. The
Revolution, with connotations of necessity, was particularly
important
because, according to the law of nations, recourse to war was lawful
only
when it became "necessary." The notion of necessity was important that,
in
addition to appearing in the introduction of the Declaration, it was
invoked
twice more at crucial junctures in the rest of the text. Labeling the
Americans"one people" and the British "another" was also laden with
implication
and performed several important strategic functions within the
Declaration.
First, because two alien peoples cannot be made one, it
reinforced the notion
that breaking the "political bands" with England was a
necessary step in the
course of human events. America and England were
already separated by the basic
fact that they had become two different
peoples. The gap between them was much
more than political; it was
intellectual, social, moral, cultural, and,
according to the principles of
nature, was irreparable. Defining the Americans
as a separate people in the
introduction eased the task of invoking the right of
revolution in the
preamble. That right, according to eighteenth-century
revolutionary
principles, could be invoked only in the most dire of
circumstances.
"Resistance was absolutely necessary in order to preserve the
nation from
slavery, misery, and ruin." If America and Great Britain were seen
as one
people, Congress could not justify revolution against the British
government
for the simple reason that the body of the people did not support
the
American cause. For America to move against the government in such
circumstances
would not be a justifiable act of resistance. By defining the
Americans as a
separate people, Congress could more readily satisfy the
requirement for
invoking the right of revolution. Like the introduction, the
next section of the
Declaration usually referred to as the preamble--is
universal in tone and scope.
It contains no explicit reference to the
British- American conflict, but
outlines a general philosophy of government
that makes revolution justifiable,
even meritorious. Like the rest of the
Declaration, the preamble is brief,
clear, and concise. Each word is chosen
and placed to achieve maximum impact.
Each clause is indispensable to the
progression of thought. Each sentence is
carefully constructed internally and
in relation to what precedes and follows.
One word follows another with
complete inevitability of sound and meaning. Not
one word can be moved or
replaced without disrupting the balance and harmony of
the entire preamble.
The sentences are composed of several thoughts linked
together, and hanging
upon one another, so that the sense of the whole is not
brought out until the
closing. None of the sentences of the preamble end on a
single-syllable word.
Only one, the second, ends on a two-syllable word. Of the
other four, one
ends with a four-syllable word "security", while three end
with
three-syllable words. Moreover, in each of the three-syllable words,
the
closing syllable is at least a medium- length four-letter syllable, which
helps
bring the sentences to a full and harmonious close. The preamble also
has a
powerful sense of structural unity. This unity is achieved partly by
the
chronological progression of thought in which the reader is moved from
the
creation of mankind, to the institution of government, to the throwing
off of
government when it fails to protect the people's unalienable rights.
The
creation of new government better secured the people's safety and
happiness. It
gave a typical quality to the ideas of the preamble and
continued the notion,
mentioned in the introduction, that the American
Revolution was a major
development in "the course of human events." The final
sentence completed a
crucial metamorphosis in the text. Although the
Declaration began in an
impersonal, even philosophical voice, it gradually
became a kind of drama, with
its tensions expressed more and more in personal
terms. This transformation
began with the appearance of the villain, "the
King of Great Britain," who
dominated the stage through the first nine
grievances, all of which noted what
"He has" done without identifying the
victim of his evil deeds. The word"our" is used twenty-six times from its first
appearance in grievance ten
times through the last sentence of the
Declaration, while "us" occurs eleven
times from its first appearance in
grievance eleven times throughout the rest of
the grievances. By the
conclusion, only the colonists remain on stage to
pronounce their dramatic
closing lines: "We . . . solemnly publish and declare
. . ." And to support
this declaration, "we mutually pledge to each other
our Lives, our Fortunes
and our sacred Honor." The persistent use of "he"
and "them," "us" and "our,"
"we" and "they" personalized the
British-American conflict. This
transfigured it from a complex struggle of
diverse origins and assorted
motives, to a simple moral drama in which suffering
people courageously
defend their liberty against a cruel and vicious tyrant. It
reduced the
detachment between the reader and the text, and coaxed the reader
into seeing
the dispute with Great Britain through the eyes of the
revolutionaries. As
the drama of the Declaration unfolded, the reader
increasingly identified
with Congress. In this respect, as in others, the
Declaration is a work
of consummate artistry. From its eloquent introduction, to
its relentless
accumulation of charges against George III, to its nostalgic
denunciation of
the British people, to its heroic closing sentence, it sustained
an almost
perfect synthesis of style, form, and content. Its solemn and
dignified tone,
its graceful and unhurried cadence, its symmetry, energy, and
confidence, its
logical structure and dramatic appeal, its skillful use of its
fine
distinction and implication all contribute to its rhetorical power.
This
process explains why the "Declaration of Independence" remains one of
the
handful of American political documents that, in addition to meeting
the
immediate needs of the moment, continues to enjoy a radiant literary
reputation.